|
Less than 1,000,001 yen |
1,000,001-3,000,000 |
3,000,001-4,000,000 |
4,000,001-6,000,000 |
6,000,001-8,000,000 |
8,000,001-10,000,000 |
10,000,000 or more yen |
Average income |
| The family which has a child |
1.5% |
10.6% |
9.4% |
24.2% |
22.2% |
14.1% |
17.9% |
2,909,000 |
| Aged family |
15.2% |
47.2% |
17.7% |
12.9% |
3.6% |
1.3% |
2.1% |
7,026,000 |
| Mother/child family |
16.2% |
62.0% |
10.2% |
8.0% |
2.0% |
1.8% |
0 |
2,246,000 |
Proportion in terms of family structure;
Family of only the married couple/unmarried child is 32.7%
Independent family is 23.4%
Family of only the married couple is 21.9%
Savings amount(2004 year);
|
It doesn't have the savings |
Less than 1,000,001 yen |
1,000,001-3,000,000 |
5,000,001-5,000,000 |
5,000,001-7,000,000 |
7,000,001-10,000,000 |
10,000,001-30,000,000 |
30,000,000 or more yen |
Average savings |
| Below 30 years old |
18.0% |
35.9% |
21.0% |
7.9% |
3.5% |
2.7% |
2.0% |
0.2% |
1,745,000 |
| 30-39 years old |
7.8% |
13.2% |
22.6% |
14.9% |
10.9% |
8.7% |
13.3% |
1.4% |
5,704,000 |
| 40-49 years old |
8.1% |
7.6% |
12.6% |
12.5% |
10.7% |
10.1% |
25.0% |
4.1% |
8,891,000 |
| 50-59 years old |
8.1% |
6.3% |
10.8% |
9.1% |
10.3% |
8.5% |
27.5% |
9.6% |
13,036,000 |
| 60-69 years old |
9.4% |
6.9% |
10.5% |
8.7% |
8.7% |
7.6% |
25.7% |
12.9% |
15,459,000 |
| Over 69 years old |
10.3% |
8.3% |
12.1% |
9.0% |
9.3% |
6.7% |
22.5% |
10.3% |
13,789,000 |
Job in terms of age;(2004 year)
|
Self-employed person |
Executive of a company/party |
General constan employee |
Constan employee of 1 or more month/Less than 1 year |
Constan employee of Less than 1 month |
Unemployed person |
Unknown |
| Below man 30 years old |
2.0% |
1.1% |
33.6% |
4.1% |
1.3% |
54.5% |
3.6% |
| Man 30-49 years old |
11.4% |
5.1% |
72.3% |
1.6% |
0.3% |
5.2% |
4.3% |
| Man 50-59 years old |
20.5% |
8.2% |
59.5% |
1.6% |
0.3% |
7.5% |
2.4% |
| Over man 59 years old |
18.6% |
4.1% |
11.2% |
3.0% |
0.6% |
59.8% |
2.7% |
| Below woman 30 years old |
1.4% |
0.6% |
29.8% |
5.5% |
1.3% |
58.6% |
3.0% |
| Woman 30-49 years old |
4.0% |
1.4% |
41.8% |
8.3% |
0.9% |
34.9% |
8.9% |
| Woman 50-59 years old |
6.4% |
2.2% |
33.0% |
7.2% |
1.0% |
37.4% |
12.8% |
| Over woman 59 years old |
4.7% |
0.7% |
4.6% |
1.5% |
0.3% |
81.0% |
7.2% |
The difference of U.S.
04/05/(20/33)
0.1% of incomes of U.S. population went up 181%.
0.01% ofincomes went up 497%.
0.1% of annual income is $402,306.
0.01% of annual income is $1,672,726.
0.001% of annual income is estimated as almost $6,000,000.
History teaches.
An advanced difference society gives birth to advanced corruption.
The increase of the income difference is "the threat to a democracy society".
The difference is increasing quickly by the gulpingly voluminous income of the minority person.
Especially the income difference is expanding in U.S.
Upper class 20% a year for the income average=$122,150 (2000 years)
Lower class 20%=$16,780
The difference be 7.3 times.
New York the income difference is big most.
Upper class 20% a year for the income average=$130,431
Lower class 20%=$16,076
The difference be 8.1 times.
Most small Wyoming of the difference is 5.2 times.
The job of the low wages expanded at the same time as the increase of the immigrant.
The growth of the pay of the low income layer was restrained.
The difference was the trend that shrinks for a while in the 1990's.
However, it became the trend of expansion once again from 2001 years.
The middle class are more serious.
The consumption pattern of the middle class is being concentrated to the consumption pattern of the rich.
The American of the middle is approached to necessity that increases the income a little more.
U.S. cut the working hours prior to the world once.
Now the worker of U.S. is working a lot 200-400 hours for a year in comparison with Europe.
What is the compensation?
The leisure time when it spends with the family and friends that love it decreases.
People come to stay favor to the range of oneself.
The interval is born to the society.
The feeling of solidarity and trust impression between the person that stay at the top/valley are fading.
The result, the emotionally support is lost with the neighbor/family who were in the U.S. society.
The health of the citizens damages it by it.
It makes health compensation and increase the income.
It buys/consumes the thing that wants although it isn't necessary diligently.
It doesn't get it finally anything.
Japan is desperate for it will catch up with U.S. style rich life.
The average span of life of the American local-based lord of the manor is low than Greece Spain Costa Rica etc.
The man is 22 rank, the woman is 19 rank in the OECD participation 28 country.
It can not buy health with money.
The health isn't the size of an economic pie and the distribution is a problem.
U.S. is the place that the distribution of wealth was incline most in the economic advanced country.
The American is indifferent to the income difference than the citizens of the foreign country.
The low income layer doesn't have the interest.
However, the distortion has become a problem by the difference recently.
The deterioration of the public peace of the poverty area.
The inclination of the eating habits of the resident.
The excessive ingestion of the meal calorie of the wealthy layer.
It drinks alcohol/cigaret too much.
The income difference/poverty rate elevated death rate.
The murder incidence/depression/the heart spasms/cancer etc.
Be the capitalism for the people of the world?
Does the law of the jungle of the capitalism contribute to mankind development?
Inhuman people are increasing day by day.
America is spending many to the Iraq war and terrorism measure without justice.
However, the lower income people layer were victims in the hurricane.
The Japanese income difference is expanding rapidly for 10-15 years.
The difference is expanding rapidly as the word called "the lower stream society" becomes a trendy word.
Tax system of Japan
04/05/(22/40)
The nation and mass media say it.
The debt balance of the country exceeded seven hundred trillion yen.
It can not supplement social welfare.
Therefore it can not avoid the consumption tax raise.
The public opinion called "the consumption tax raise unavoidable" is being made in Japan.
Why the financial deficit expand?
Who make a voluminous financial deficit?
Did the general citizens make a voluminous financial deficit?
How be the pension/medical treatment insurance that the citizens continues to pay for long?
The government and mass media don't touch it.
The tax revenues of ten trillion yen decreased for a year with the tax reduction to the corporation tax and person in upper income brackets that recur.
Income tax:
The tax rate was 15 stages, the private local inhabitants tax was 14 stages until 1987 year.
The highest tax rate was 70% of income taxes.
It was 88% of inclusion even 18% the local inhabitants tax.
The highest tax rate/highest taxation amount of income was lowered quickly in 1994, 1988, 1987 year.
The highest tax rate became 37% in 1999 year.
It was lowered to half previous.
Even the tax rate became 4 stages.
Even the private local inhabitants tax became 3 stages from 14 stages.
| Large tax reduction to people in upper income brackets |
|
Highest tax rate |
Highest taxable income |
Lowest tax rate |
Stage |
| 1971-1983 year |
75 % |
80,000,000 yen ultra |
10.0 % |
19 |
| 1984-1986 year |
70 % |
80,000,000 yen ultra |
10.5 % |
15 |
| 1987 year |
60 % |
50,000,000 yen ultra |
10.5 % |
12 |
| 1988 year |
60 % |
50,000,000 yen ultra |
10.0 % |
6 |
| 1989-1998 year |
50 % |
30,000,000 yen ultra |
10.0 % |
5 |
| 1999- |
37 % |
18,000,000 yen ultra |
10.0 % |
4 |
Corporation tax
It is a campaign "Internationally competitive power becomes weak if corporation tax is high".
It has been reduced to the every time.
| Large tax reduction to the large enterprise |
| 1988 year |
1991 year |
1995 year |
1998 year |
1999 year |
| 42.0 % |
37.5 % |
37.5 % |
34.5 % |
30.0 % |
Corporate tax rate;
1984 years 43.3%
1989 years 40%
1990 years 37.5%
1998 years 34.5%
1999 years 30%
Even the corporate enterprise tax was lowered to 9.6% from 12%.
Moreover, the large enterprise has the special tax reduction such as the research development tax reduction other.
It is natural that the deficit increases and tax revenues decreases if the tax reduction is repeated to the large enterprise/person in upper income brackets.
Also many of the taxes are used by the demand of the large enterprise/the U.S. government.
The large enterprise is receiving the benefit of the profit.
The benefit has not revolved in many citizenses.
Takeshita Cabinet introduced the consumption tax for welfare.
It carried out it with 3% from April, 1989.
It was raised 5% from April, 1997 (Hashimoto Cabinet).
The consumption tax is the tax of weak-person bullying, as the lower income person and pension life person burden heavy.
Moreover the article of food/daily necessities etc. are a low rate or 0 in the indirect tax of West.
The Japanese consumption tax doesn't have the consideration to article of food etc. at all.
Therefore the burden is an extremely heavy tax to the lower income person if it is 5%.
Furthermore "the exportation return tax" exists in the exportation enterprise.
The consumption tax of the exportation sales is 0 because the consumption tax isn't able to take it from the consumer of the foreign country.
Oppositely, the consumption tax that was linked to the laying in stock can pull it.
Namely, "the exportation return tax" is able to receive it.
The total amount of this return tax is one trillion seven hundred billion yen for a year.
Soon the return tax to TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. is seven hundred billion yen.
Even the amount of the return tax increases as the consumption tax rate rises.
The Japanese Economy Union, Chairman Okuda etc. assert the consumption tax substantial raise it because it is connected to the profit of the company of oneself.
The Government Tax Commission is admitting also that the consumption tax is reverse binary.
However, the Government Tax Commission says.
"It is covering because the income tax is progressive taxation"
"It is safe because social security exists"
However, It is cutting social security quickly actually.
Only the citizens burden is increasing.
Japan in the postwar
04/05/(22/50)
The basis of the Japanese tax system after the war;
The tax has the function that does the allocation of the income.
The difference of the income results even if it works hard.
Therefore it makes the principle that it shares by ability.
The high person of the income has a high tax rate.
It makes the income difference of small with the combination of progressive taxation/social security.
It makes the society and nation that the welfare was thorough.
It is the responsibility of politics to revise the difference.
It should try it shared to the large enterprise/person in upper income brackets if it demands a consumption tax substantial raise.
Conversely, the government tried to lower the charge on national treasury rate of the livelihood protection allowance expense Because the livelihood protection allowance family exceeded 1,000,000 family.
It is social weak man bullying exactly.
The Constitution says.
"The security of the life of a cultural lowest limit"
The family which has a house (2004 year);
The family which has a house is 66.5%
Aged family is 77.4%
The family which is of (65 years old over) the aged is 84.7%
The family which has a child is 66.0%
Mother/child family is 23.1%
Situation of life consciousness (2004 year);
All family of "usually" 39.4%
"Painful" 55.8%
Aged family of "usually" 45.5% (1.15 times)
"Painful" 50.0% (0.90 times)
The family which has a child of "usually" 33.5% (0.85 times)
"Painful" 63.1% (1.13 times)
Mother/child family of "usually" 12.9% (0.33 times)
"Painful" 85.9% (1.54 times)
Japanese society try to be severed to two
04/05/(22/55)
The private finance property was 1,416,000,000,000,000 yen (2005 year).
It is 3 times of GDP.
It is about 2 after America in the balance of citizens per capita.
It continues with England, Germany, France.
Private finance property seems to increase even this year due to the stock prices rise.
The unsavings family increase while the property of the whole citizens increases.
The Japanese society breaks through to the layer society certainly.
The wealth is concentrating on a special layer 1 pole after bubble collapse.
It is said that the dictatorship organization of Nazis was selected by the ruin of the middle class.
The existence of the middle class isn't dispensable, to enable the continuation of a healthy democracy organization.
The Japanese society try to be severed to two of the person who has wealth, doesn't have wealth.
The U. S. armed forces located in japan volume
04/26/(18/02)
U.S. Government said "the U. S. armed forces located in japan volume is based to the demand of Japan".
The U.S. government demanded the burden of the U. S. armed forces located in japan volume on the side of Japan.
Japanese Government is also saying "it is base burden reduction".
"The burden reduction" is a trick.
The U. S. armed forces located in japan volume were not the discussion that began from burden reduction.
The U.S. side had evident intention from the beginning.
It wanted to develop the opening gambit of a war mobility.
Moreover, it does so that it is able to fight a war with the allied country such as Japan.
Japanese Self-Defense Force is showing the movement that unifies there.
Oly the headquarters of the Okinawa Marine Corps move to Guam.
The battle corps remains in Okinawa as it is.
The U.S. government establishes the new battle headquarters of an American army in the Zama base (Kanagawa Pref).
The atomic power aircraft carrier is stationed at the Yokosuka harbor (Kanagawa Pref).
The U.S. government and the Japanese Government agreed that 59% (Six billion ninety million dollars) of the Guam move expense is the Japanese burden. (April 24, 2006)
A national defense subVice-Minister announced in Department of Defense. (April 25, 2006)
"The investment of Japan to the alliance is voluminous amount.
Japan pays out fairly in addition to the Guam move expense of the Marine Corps.
The U. S. armed forces located in japan volume total amount are about thirty billion dollars.
U.S. burden is four billion dollars of the Guam move expense.
Japanese burden is about twenty-six billion dollars (twenty billion dollars to the volume relation expense and the Guam move expense) at least."
The Japanese Government was expecting twenty billion dollars at the beginning.
The total amount of the Japanese burden has over thirty billion dollars of possibility.
The Japanese Government is scheduled to appropriate it with the general account.
The volume end time is 2012 year.
The U. S. armed forces stationing expense burden
04/26/(18/5)
The Japanese burden of the stationing of the U. S. armed forces located in japan exceeds eight billion dollars for a year after the volume.
The Japanese Government looks like to the best in the world U.S. government the good country of generosity.
The burden comparatively of the allied country that occupies it to the U. S. armed forces stationing expense.
The U. S. armed forces stationing expense that the allied country of U.S. shares (2002 year)
The U. S. armed forces stationing expense burden;
The amount that the allied country in such an expense which the U. S. armed forces get stationed to the allied country be sharing.
Japan...4,411,340,000 dollars (2002 year)
2.8 times of Germany.
5.2 times of Korea.
12 times of Italy.
18.5 times of England.
It is more than 26 country of total the allied countries of other U.S.
It is bigger than the totals (3,985,820,000 dollars) of 26 country of U. S. armed forces stationing expense allotment other than Japan.
The burden to every 1 stationing American soldier
Every 1 American soldier;
(It calculates it per capita the American soldier who gets stationed)
Japan...106,000 dollars (2004 year)
3.8 times of Italy
4.9 times of Korea, Germany
The proportion of the allotment that occupies it to the U. S. armed forces stationing expense;
Japan...74.5%
Japan is sharing about 3/4.
Direct support amount is 3,228,430,000 dollars.
6.6 times of Korea (486,610,000 dollars)
It is 112 times of Germany (28,700,000 dollars).
The basis of the burden has been not entered to Japan and America position accord.
Japan has shared the institution construction cost of the base/labor expense of the base employee/light heated water charge/training expense/residence.
Institution construction;
Family residence for a gorgeous American soldier
Recreation institution
Bomb-resistant shelter
Hangar etc.
Expansion construction work of the Iwakuni base of the U. S. armed forces volume.
Indirect support amount is 1,182,920,000 dollars.
The offer of the national land/remission of the tax etc.
The U. S. armed forces located in Korea volume
04/26/(18/10)
An U.S. Pacific army commander reported in an American Lower House annual expenditure committee. (April 8, 2006)
I announced that Korea shares six billion eight hundred million dollars of the U. S. armed forces located in Korea volume.
The Korea government was expecting that it shares five billion dollars.
The burden of one billion eight hundred million dollars more furthermore increased than this.
The Asahi newspaper did a public opinion poll. (March 19, 2006)
The burden of the U. S. armed forces Guam move expense;
I am not able to understand...78%
70% were exceeded in all the period.
Even the Liberal Democratic Party support layer was 72%.
Women (84%), men (73%).
The move to Iwakuni etc.;
It should make the agreement of local...63%
It should advance it with the judgment of the nation...27%
The citizens of local gathered for the new base construction opposite.
The plot crime
04/26/(22/02)
The government is about to make the plot crime law. (April 25, 2006)
The government votes this law in the Diet judicial affairs committee on 28th day.
The government is submitting the plot crime to the Diet since the ordinary session of the Diet in 2003 year.
It has become the every time rejected measure.
However, it decided the deliberation in the Diet now on April, 2006.
The method of the proposal isn't usually about the plot crime.
The air between the ruling party and opposition party are cold.
It is the atmosphere close to the wiretapping law in 1999 year.
The government said "This law is the thing based on the International organized crimes prevention treaty that was adopted in the United Nations in November, 2001".
However this law is containing unrelated law with the International organized crimes.
The crime that applies reaches 600 or more.
Public Office Election Law/the Liquor Tax Law/Securities and Exchange Law/mail law/Road Traffic Law etc.
The police monitor the conversation, telephones, mail, daily action of people with various forms.
It assumed that free of to privacy and real intention are intimidated.
The surveillance society is strengthened.
The nation power intervenes to the communication of the people of interior outside if this law is implemented.
It takes "the meeting/association/speech/publication/freedom of other expression" that Constitution guaranteed.
What is the plot crime?
This law can punish it just joining to the conference even if it doesn't implement crime.
The police arrest the person who just planned if the person isn't starting on a crime actually.
It is just like the terrorism control of U.S.
The opposition party is repelling it very much.
The Ozawa party leader of the Democratic Party says it.
"The compulsion measure by the nation power is try to break out.
It restrains the basic human right of the citizens.
The crime constitution important matter isn't determined strictly.
It assumed to expand the discretion of the authorities."
Playwright organization opposed "the plot crime".
"The basis, structure, intention itself are the important treachery to the citizens.
We give the carte blanche to state authority.
It is an equal serious problem to sign away the freedom of the citizens.
'The play' is the expression that materializes by the human being fellow gathers.
It denies the communication of free/diversity of expression"
The JCA-NET director announced the announcement.
"We oppose the plot crime because it takes the free communication of people and accelerate surveillance society -ization.
It punishes the opinion exchange/opinion announcement/formation of the agreement by a discussion.
It isn't a deed.
It makes the object of the regulation to the thought.
We absolutely can not permit the plot crime.
JCA-NET is communication NGO of an ungain.
It is requesting the overcoming of discrimination/social/environment target/economic justice.
We support it with the information communication, to form a continuation possible civil society."
The Japanese lawyer federation opposed strongly.
"We can evaluate regular.
However, many problems aren't revised.
It should limit it in the case that the organized crimes group get involved.
It is connected to the regulation of the citizen party without relation with crime.
It is from a distrust impression to oppose the plot crime."
NGO, NPO of 168 parties opposed the establishment of the plot crime.
NGO is 'No!' to the plot crime because we don't regret later.
NGO is concerned in environmental conservation and international cooperation.
NGO is apprehending that "the plot crime" exerts bad influence to the citizen activity.
"It has the possibility that becomes crime, just being consulting to entreat to the government/enterprise if the plot crime is applied.
The plot crime is the law that the discussion is able to punish.
The world is facing to a war.
'War comes with the silence of such people'
The government can crush the obstructive party selfishly.
The civil society collapses if it comes to be able to punish the person who was related to a discussion."
The Japanese Government can not oppose against the demand of the U.S. government.
04/27/(19/05)
Japanese Government was shaking to the U. S. armed forces located in japan volume cost of three trillion yen today.
Abe next Prime Minister candidate interview the consumption tax increase immediately.
I fear the future of Japan with today's interview.
I thought Abe next Prime Minister candidate like an unstable person.
Doesn't the wiser person exist in the next Prime Minister candidates?
It is only the greenhorns.
The Japanese Government of now seems to torment only a weak citizens because it isn't able to go against a strong person.
Many citizenses are becoming disappointed.
Who be the Japanese Government of now talking while seeing?
I want to cling to the Democratic Party.
